counter for web page
Nursing Assistant Resources On The Web » Opinion


  • Member

    codeofethics
    • Perspective
    • Confidentiality
    • Disclosure
    • Reliability
    • Courtesy


  • Popular Content

  • Connect

  • CNA Advocacy Associations

  • CNA Continuing Ed Sites

  • State Direct Care Worker/CNA Associations

  • We Recommend:

  • Books

  • Medpage Today Geriatric News

  • Fair Use Notice

    Fair Use Notice

    All Materials Here Copyright © 1997-2009

  • Meta

  • Archive for the 'Opinion' Category

    Safety Vs Quality of Life

    Posted by Kim on 17th June 2010

    I’ve always thought nursing homes, and the staff who work at them, place far too much “value” on resident safety issues. I’ve also always believed we use resident “safety” as an excuse to restrict residents movement, diet, preferences and so on. So when I read this article, it resonated with me in a big way.

    Our culture values our ability to fix problems — or to think we can. We like to measure things, but happiness and autonomy are hard to measure. We insist that someone must be responsible for everything that goes wrong, which makes everyone obsessive about liability. And, of course, we don’t like to acknowledge that old people have limited life spans, or that some risks to life and limb — in the opinion of those whose life and limbs are at risk — might be worth accepting.

    Is safety worth trading over autonomy? I’m not convinced it is.

    • Share/Bookmark

    Posted in Opinion | 1 Comment »

    Culture Change Now in In CMS Interpretive Guidelines

    Posted by Patti on 22nd April 2009

    Will Culture Change be mandated? It appears so. Over at PHI, Aaron has a post about CMS’s new Interpretive Guidelines coming out, which address more homelike environments in nursing homes. We’ve posted often here about the benefits of Culture Change, and it’s about time CMS joined the band wagon on this.

    The changes, which go into effect on June 17, 2009, are intended to support efforts underway to transform nursing homes into “homey” environments through both environmental changes and resident-centered caregiving. Whereas in the past, these changes were sometimes stymied by fear that regulators would cite organizations for deficiencies, CMS is now making it clear that the OBRA regulations should be interpreted to support personal choice in the full range of daily activities, including waking, bathing, dining, and sleeping. The new guidance also calls for visitors to have 24-hour access to residents, regardless of familial relationship.

    The new interpretive guidelines call on nursing homes to begin or to continue de-institutionalizing their physical environments. Suggestions include: reducing noise such as overhead paging and alarm bells, eliminating nursing stations, taking down institutional signage, and refraining from serving meals on institutional trays.

    Get ready for the complaining. Eliminating nursing stations!?! But how can they expect us to do our work…But we can’t…and so on.

    Pony up folks. Culture change is much needed process and we’ll all be better off with it. Allowing the residents to control their environment and choices is really a human right. Safety, and all those other excuses we tend to use, are just that: EXCUSES. We don’t want to give up our “power”. It’s not about us. It is about our customers- the residents.

    Some Culture Change Sites of Interest:
    Pioneer Network

    Check out the PN’s vast selection of resource links HERE.

    • Share/Bookmark

    Posted in Blog, CNA Tips & Advice, Culture Change, Interviews, News, Opinion, What's New | 5 Comments »

    LTC Industry Low Wage Help

    Posted by Heather on 21st April 2009

    Direct care workers- CNA’s and others- have been pushing for better pay, better benefits and working conditions for YEARS now. Direct care worker advocates have also been speaking LOUD on our behalf. We’ve barely made any progress, and many of us hope that the new President will lift us out of the world of low pay, disrespected work…the prospect of the Employee Free Choice Act passing into law will help elevate these dreams.

    The LTC industry is getting excited about this as well, but for a more sinister reason.
    From McKnights LTC News:

    A major development is afoot in the labor movement, and it could have interesting implications for long-term care.

    I’m talking about American unions’ recent plans to unify. In case you haven’t heard, the leaders of the two major federations and the nation’s 12 largest unions have formed the National Labor Coordinating Committee. The interim body will help form the federation.

    Naturally, the thought of one massive union, 16 million members strong, is enough to send shivers down a long-term care employer’s spine. But let’s think about this a minute.

    Clearly, a single union could have an impact on unionization. This is the year of the card check, and if the Employee Free Choice Act passes, nursing homes could be facing a serious increase in union activity.

    Sounds good huh? Never trust the LTC industry to do the right thing for YOU.

    But there also may be at least one area in which nursing homes can benefit from a unified labor front. That is immigration reform. The AFL-CIO and Change to Win federations recently said they are joining forces to support the effort. That includes a path to citizenship for undocumented workers.

    Why worry about immigration reform, in the broader picture here?

    Read on:

    The American Health Care Association, the largest association of nursing homes, if you will remember, was in favor of a guest worker program that would provide a temporary workforce of skilled and unskilled workers for employers in the future. Given the industry’s reliance on low-wage help, that is not surprising.

    Read that last sentence. LOW WAGE HELP. The thinking here is simple: Bring in as many immigrants as possible, allow them to fill our shoes, at lower rates of pay…supported by the Unions of course…And read between the lines: Unskilled workers = low wages is NOT GOOD FOR US. These efforts will drive down our rates of pay. Why would any facility hire an American CNA who will expect a living wage- when hiring an immigrant who will work for cheap hourly rate is a viable option? We need to seriously think this out and speak up on it.

    What is your opinion on this?

    • Share/Bookmark

    Posted in Employment Issues, News, Opinion | 6 Comments »

    …don’t get excited yet

    Posted by Kim on 18th March 2009

    So all this talk about the Federal Stimulus money and where it’s going got me curious. Many advocates for direct care workers wanted to see funds go to US- in pay or benefits. As usual, it doesn’t look like this is going to happen.

    Stimulus Dollars Go to Medicaid, Health Clinics

    The establishment of the Office of Recovery Act Coordination last week means the $137 billion stimulus money is a step closer to healthcare professions, but don’t get excited yet.

    Except for stimulus money to help care for the needy, healthcare funding is on hold while officials develop a process to dole out funds.

    Creating The Office of Recovery Act Coordination, which will oversee how the portion of Department of Health and Human Services money is spent, is the first step in the process.

    Has Washington has let us down again? Or, did those who advocate for us expect too much, too soon? Did anyone really think the government would step up to help us out- via a well deserved raise and a health care plan that is affordable? Ofcourse, these things can still happen, and I have the highest expectations that Obama will deliver. But right now, it seems like wages and benefits of HEALTH CARE workers is not a priority.

    • Share/Bookmark

    Posted in News, Opinion | 1 Comment »

    Money Isn’t Everything

    Posted by Patti on 10th March 2009

    A person who works in a low wage occupation should be held as accountable for crimes as those who work in high paid careers. At least, in my opinion.

    On average, a certified nursing assistant in Illinois makes less than a dog walker.

    Really.

    I ran across an ad offering $8.50 an hour to work as a certified nursing assistant at a suburban location.

    Nationally, the annual median salary for the job, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, is $10.67 an hour, and certified nursing assistants (CNAs) who work in community care facilities for the elderly are the lowest paid.

    After about 20 years or more on the job, these workers earn about $12 to $15 an hour, according to the Nursing Assistant Central Web page.

    But with only one year of experience, a dog walker in this state can earn $11 an hour. In New York, the amount jumps to $20.35.

    We know this is the truth.

    I suspect it only takes a love of animals, a tolerance for poo and a good pair of walking shoes to become a dog walker.

    I’m not saying most CNAs are not compassionate, caring individuals.

    But after welfare reform, many of the people who ended up in this field did so because they desperately needed a job.

    Was that a swipe or what? I agree that many in this work are in it just for the fast money…not that there’s much to earn, but it’s a quick way to gain semi meaningful employment.

    The rest of this article attempts to link the death of an nursing home resident with the uncaring, low paid CNA work and, interestingly, a societal lack of respect for the elderly. We care so little about our old people, that we allow low paid reformed welfare recipients to provide care…I think there is some truth to this. However, even the lowly CNA must always be held accountable for his or her actions! We cannot let them off simply because of the career they have chosen.

    What say you?

    • Share/Bookmark

    Posted in Blog, News, Opinion | 1 Comment »

    Cost Effectiveness Vs The Elderly

    Posted by Heather on 23rd February 2009

    At the New York Times, a blog called The New Old Age covers everything about taking care of elderly parents and other loved ones. It’s an excellent resource. The author of the blog, Jane Gross, took care of her own mother when she became too sick to do this herself. Jane has a lot of experience with “the system” – the good and bad. I have a lot of respect for Ms. Gross.

    However in her most recent post, she writes about the potential rationing of health care for people who receive federal assistance- based upon the probable “comparative effectiveness research” on medical procedures, pharmaceuticals and devices. What this is about is the Obama administration’s plans to form a board that will decide which procedures will be cost effective…the plan doesn’t come right out and declare that procedures and treatments will be denied payment- but one can assume this will be the case.
    Ms. Gross supports the plan and explains why.

    We need to remember that a very tiny amount of people are covered by Medicare. Less than 2% of our elderly population receive federal assistance. Even as the baby boomers come to age, these numbers will increase a lot but not enough to make a huge dent, overall, of the elderly population. The fact is, most old people will fend for themselves when they get old: Either they are rich, or have prepared and saved enough money, or their families will provide care.

    Ms. Gross:

    The goal of comparative effectiveness research isn’t to kill people who otherwise have good and long lives ahead of them. The goal is to make rational decisions about what works and what doesn’t, what makes sense and what doesn’t, in a universe of limited resources — and to stop indulging the fantasy that it is possible, or even desirable, to live forever if we just take one more pill or have one more surgical procedure.

    I have a question. Senator Kennedy has brain cancer, tumors and he’s ailing. He is not considered to THAT old- in terms of the discussion Ms. Gross takes on in her post. Kennedy’s cancer is terminal. It is going to kill him. Because of his personal wealth and endless resources, he has been able to get every treatment, every new and untested medication, for his condition. Some of the drugs are only known to extend life by a few weeks if not a month. It’s all very expensive care. He’s rich and can afford it.

    What about the lady I once took care of at the local nursing home? She was 75; had mid-stage Alzheimer’s Disease. She relied upon Medicare to pay for her nursing home care. She was able to do her own care still, and recognized her children; she could still manage her ADL’s and she was expected to live another three to five yrs. One day we found a lump on her breast. They sent her out for testing and sure enough, it was cancerous. It was large- but still contained within a sack. It had not metastasized. Her family, her daughter to be exact, declined any treatment, knowing that it would not increase her Mother’s longevity. She figured the “dementia” will kill her Mom before the cancer did her in.

    The lady experienced horrendous pain and disfigurement over the next TWO years. That lump grew, it came out of her breast, it weeped blood, pus and other nasty stuff. It smelled terrible. It caused the woman so much pain she would pass out. She never screamed- she would just curl up in a ball and cry softly for hours on end. This is with morphine for pain control. Nothing we did comforted her. The woman lived for two years with this horrible cancer, spreading throughout her frail body- into her liver, then her lungs, her brain, her spine. She lost her sight. She ended up on O2 most the time; she died of breast cancer. Not her dementia.

    How do we protect people like this woman, in an age where we are willing to discuss rationing health care for old people? Did this woman deserve to die, in such a horrible manner, simply because her daughter didn’t think her quality of life would suffer? In terms of government funding, would it be acceptable to deny care, based upon some research recommendations?

    Ms. Gross points out that many old people (women) are “subjected” to needless tests such as pap smears and annual mammograms…in all my years of experience at nursing homes, never once did I see old ladies being sent out for these tests. I did see families insisting upon exrays when a fall occurred; I did see hip surgeries performed. I’ve seen dental work being performed as well.

    K Tree, CNA has noted a few times at her blog, how a DNR order seems to mean- DO NOT TREAT...which is totally wrong. When an old person, confined to a nursing facility, shows symptoms of a UTI or bronchitis or strep throat, I believe they MUST be treated. DNR orders don’t tell us to DENY TREATMENT of these things.

    I fear that the world Ms. Gross would like to live in will deny this, and much more. I get a sense of strong resentment from Ms. Gross, towards old people…the sense that somehow these people are a drain on resources and therefore not worthy of receiving a newly defined set of rules for what is adequate and appropriate. We have to be careful when we go down this road. It is, a very slippery slope.

    • Share/Bookmark

    Posted in News, Opinion | 5 Comments »

    Alzheimer’s Drugs: Are They Worth It?

    Posted by Patti on 13th January 2009

    For those of us who have worked in nursing homes, we know many residents who are given drugs to help them with agitation, depression and other “behaviors”. But do we know how dangerous these drugs can be?

    An article explores how the use of meds can cut short the life of a person with Alzheimers.

    LONDON (AP) – Anti-psychotic drugs commonly used to treat Alzheimer’s disease may double a patient’s chance of dying within a few years, suggests a new study that adds to concerns already known about such medications.

    “For the vast majority of Alzheimer’s patients, taking these drugs is probably not a worthwhile risk,” said Clive Ballard, the paper’s lead author, of the Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases at King’s College London.

    “Would I want to take a drug that slightly reduced my aggression but doubled my risk of dying? I’m not sure I would,” Ballard said.

    I’m sure if they asked a CNA who has to deal with an agitated and acting out person with Alzheimers, the answer would be YES. Aggression takes many forms…some harmless and others not so. CNA’s get the brunt of these aggressions: We get hit, kicked, bitten, pulled, punched and so on. The violence a person with Alzheimers can produce and aim towards us is quite amazing.

    Alzheimer’s disease is the most common cause of dementia and causes symptoms including aggression, delusions and hallucinations. Previous studies have shown anti-psychotic drugs, which can help control the aggression and hallucinations for a few months raise the risk of death in older patients with dementia. There are other side effects, including respiratory problems and stroke.

    The violence isn’t always aimed at the aides. Other residents and families are often targets. Most of us do realize the person with AD cannot control their behaviors. We know they would not do these things in their “right” mind. The reality is clear though: An aggressive resident is a threat to all, in the nursing home setting.

    Ballard and colleagues followed 165 patients aged 67 to 100 years with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease from 2001 to 2004 in Britain. Half continued taking their anti-psychotic drugs, which included Risperdal, Thorazine and Stelazine. The other half got placebos.

    Of the 83 receiving drugs, 39 were dead after a year. Of the 82 taking fake pills, 27 were dead after a year. Most deaths in both groups were due to pneumonia.

    After two years, 46 percent of Alzheimer’s patients taking the anti-psychotics were alive, versus 71 percent of those not on the drugs. After three years, only 30 percent of patients on the drugs were alive, versus 59 percent of those not taking drugs.

    I wonder if they kept track of behaviors of the people who were given the placebos? THAT would be interesting data to see. It’s pretty clear that these drugs somehow hasten the death of Alzheimer victims. In the end, they all die- a sad fact. Alzheimer’s is an awful and brutal disease and one I do not wish upon anyone.

    Experts aren’t sure how the anti-psychotics increase patients’ risk of dying. But they think the drugs could be damaging to the brain and their sedative effects make patients less able to exercise and more susceptible to deadly infections.

    I agree. I’ve seen many a resident start taking these meds – and the meds DO work. They “calm” the resident down to a level of “safety” that works for the environment. The person is able to stay still longer, so we see less wandering and unsafe movements.

    However, I’ve also seen how this turns into a mobility problem: Due to “time restraints” aides tend to push the resident around in a wheelchair vs assist them with ambulating…Legs get stiff, contractures settle in, ambulation is no longer possible. So the resident becomes wheelchair and bed bound, and totally dependent upon us for all care.

    We see other outcomes every day: They no longer have control of their bladders and bowels. Skin issues become more pronounced. Sitting in one position for hours on end results in red areas, open areas and everyone knows what this means.

    Residents gradually require more and more assistance with eating and drinking. Meds change the appetite, the desire to eat and drink. Meds also alter the ability to smell and taste food. Since there aren’t enough of US to do it all in a timely manner, the food goes in cold and gross; drinks are forced down (and let’s not forget how the disease process screws up the ability to swallow correctly); oral care isn’t the top priority and infection is likely present. The resident loses weight, becomes dehydrated and the vicious cycle continues.

    Exactly how much of this is caused by the meds isn’t known, yet. But I think we can all say the decline starts when the meds start. Are they worth it?

    The decline will happen no matter what. That’s a given. Those months, even years- of Alzheimer’s induced behaviors are a turning point. Most families will seek a nursing home admission when these things happen. They can’t manage it. Nursing homes “manage” it with drugs.

    Is there a better way? Would a really good and targeted Activities Program help? I think so. There are a great many people who believe that all “behavior” is a form of communication, even coming from those whose brains are literally deteriorating. I have seen how well planned yet spontaneous activity programs work WONDERS with people with all forms of dementia. It takes everyone to make these programs work though- aides, housekeepers, the DON, the administrator…everyone. I’d like to see some research done on this. The costs savings alone should make sense: Meds are expensive! Activities are cheap in comparison.

    • Share/Bookmark

    Posted in Culture Change, News, Opinion | 4 Comments »

    Bureaucracy Hinders Good Care

    Posted by Kim on 6th October 2008

    Another article from Huffington Post, about nursing homes. This reflects a sad state of affairs that I’m afraid is true.

    Philip Cohen:

    Even as the poor quality of nursing home care has become a cliché, nursing home care costs have been rising faster than those for services in general. According to economist Nancy Folbre, writing in Science, this has to do with increasing demand for paid care as women enter the workforce, and as they get better job opportunities. But the other “problem” is that care workers actually care about their clients, which makes them behave inefficiently. In response, employers create bureaucracy to keep the care workers in line. Because good care work requires hard-to-measure skills and behavior, this defensive action by employers may actually increase costs and reduce the quality of care. Folbre writes: “Unlike the idealized consumers of standard economic theory, care recipients may not know themselves what they need, and they don’t enjoy a menu of many alternative choices. Their very lack of consumer sovereignty makes them vulnerable to institutional pressures to cut costs by lowering aspects of quality that are difficult to measure.”

    The elephant in the room of the care quality crisis is gender. The bedrock of nursing home care is the staff of nursing aides, orderlies and attendants. There are 589,000 of them, with average annual wages are $23,000 – and 89% of them are women.

    So, by setting low standards to begin with, we see how this happens. Also, counting on residents being uneducated about their rights as well as what good care really is, the industry takes advantage. Add to this the lack of respect given to CNA’s, as evidenced by low pay and bad benefits, we see a pattern of institutional pressure for sure.

    When will this change? CNA’s must become their own advocates before they can do so for their residents. Luckily we have many family groups and other resident advocacy organizations standing up. But how effective is their work when they push the very buttons that created this mess in the first place? Political action and trust in certain groups and parties is close minded. Everyone who really cares must think outside the box and come up with other solutions.

    • Share/Bookmark

    Posted in News, Opinion | No Comments »

    Welcome to Nursing Assistant Resources On The Web

    Posted by Patti on 7th September 2008

    Thanks for stopping by!

    The goal of this web portal is to bring together the many online resources and links and information to one central place. The work of CNA’s is important and valuable. We believe the more informed CNA’s are, the better quality work they will produce. This site is for nursing assistants and those who care about our work/practice. We have a web audience that includes aides, nurses, doctors, DON’s, Administrators, families and advocates for the elderly.

    Links to many resources are located in the sidebars. Check them out; we believe you will find most of these valuable.

    WHAT IS HERE:


    Frequently Asked Questions:

    …and more.

    Educational Articles:

    …and more.

    Advice For CNA’s:

    …and more.

    Need to contact us? Easy. Send us an email.

    If you’re familiar with RSS, you can subscribe to this web site/blog using this feed URL.

    You can also receive email alerts whenever we update this site by signing up below:

    Enter your Email


    Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

    For the latest news and postings, scroll down.

    • Share/Bookmark

    Posted in Blog, Opinion | Comments Off

    Politics and Nursing Home/LTC Reform

    Posted by Heather on 1st September 2008

    I know Patti has a rule about no political posting here, but I’m putting that aside for the time because a couple items have caught my attention.

    1) Several weeks ago Kim posted about the LTC industry, and the people who work within this industry, have no trust in Barack Obama when it comes to reforming health care. Surprisingly no comments were left on that post.

    2) Over at the PHI Blog they have made a big deal that the Democrats have mentioned direct care workers and fair wages and more training.

    3) In fact, the Republicans have mentioned long term care and it’s problems in their past two platform drafts.

    Read the rest of this entry »

    • Share/Bookmark

    Posted in Culture Change, News, Opinion | 6 Comments »