NYC CNA’s on Strike: Why?
Posted by Kim on May 26th, 2008 / Print This Post
A nursing home in New York City cut off health benefits to it’s staff over last summer, and they have been on strike since February.
After three wearying months of walking the picket line, 220 nursing home workers at the Kingsbridge Heights Rehabilitation and Care Center in the west Bronx have had plenty of time to sharpen their message.
“Health care workers like us should have health care coverage,” said Jacqueline Simono, who has worked for 10 years at the six-story, 400-bed nursing home.
In August, the nursing home stopped paying the workers’ health insurance premiums, and as a result, their coverage was cut off. That, the workers say, was the main reason they went on strike on Feb. 20.
The workers, members of 1199 S.E.I.U. United Healthcare Workers East, say they are expecting the National Labor Relations Board to give them some good news soon to help end the strike.
Sadly, those on strike are not earning any income and I cannot imagine how they are making ends meet right now. The costs of health care benefits is skyrocketing for everyone- not just health care workers. We’re seeing more and more businesses from every sector dropping coverages or increasing premiums.
Reading the rest of this article, it isn’t clear what’s really going on here. One thing: If these staff belong to a union, it is the unions’ job to make sure benefits are part of any bargaining plan. Somehow, somewhere, someone let the ball drop here.
I did a little digging into this situation and found a couple articles worth mention.
From a May 7th article:
NEW YORK–About 5,000 members of 1199SEIU from across the Northeast rallied May 3 to support 220 strikers at the Kingsbridge Heights Nursing Home, whose owner, Helen Sieger, has refused for six years to sign a contract with SEIU or pay into the 1199 health benefits fund.
The overwhelmingly immigrant strikers entered the rally at Fort Independence Park in a boisterous show of force, calling on a broad spectrum of militant national labor traditions.
[...]
Bartosz and Tomas, two strikers from Poland, described Helen Sieger’s anti-labor practices: “We have no sick days. We have no health benefits. We are required to arrive at 10:30, but are only paid from 11:00 on. Though we should finish at 7:00, we often have to work later, also without pay.”
[...]
A number of federal, state and city politicians and union officials spoke at the rally, including SEIU President Andy Stern and Sen. Charles Schumer. Barack Obama spoke through a recorded message. SEIU members from Albany and Rochester, N.Y., turned out, along with others from Massachusetts, New Jersey and the Washington-Baltimore area.The rally highlighted the role that immigrants play in organized labor. A win for the Kingsbridge workers will be a victory for both the immigrant rights and labor movements.
There were not 5000 people at any rally for this. That is a gross exaggeration. Using militant strike methods wins few friends in these causes; however, asking politicians to speak on the behalf of those on strike is admirable.
The fact that many of those on strike are immigrants leads me to ask the tough question: Are they legally entitled to work in the US? Are these people just doing another job Americans won’t do? I wonder how many American CNA’s worked for this facility?
Finally, I ask this: If there is a strong union here, HOW do we explain such bad working “conditions” that include no sick days, not being paid for actual times worked, and so on? In many places of employment, meal breaks are not paid time. So, employees are expected to be on premises for 8 1/2 hours- eight of which are paid and the other that is not. And exactly how much longer were they made to stay over 7:00? A few minutes or hours? If minutes, then this issue is moot. If hours, then there is a serious problem. The devil is in the details, and we’re not getting those.
I also found the latest survey information for this facility. As usual, it doesn’t provide a clear picture of the facility, but all in all it isn’t THAT BAD. I have no doubt this place is a dungeon to work in; I also have little reason to believe the management gives one hoot about the workers. But my instincts tell me we’re not being given ALL the facts.
I ask people to be skeptical on these articles because the lack of detail can make a huge difference. A unionized nursing home should NOT have these issues. A union that has failed it’s members, however, might encourage a strike just to blow smoke in the air around it’s own failings and obscure the truth.
May 29th, 2008 at 6:40 pm
It looks like the workers at this nursing home are on strike because their employer stopped paying for their health insurance. While they have filed unfair labor practice charges with the national labor relations board, that is frequently a long process until you see results.
When you have a union, you expect management to follow a contract and agree to honor its commitments. in this case, when management refuses to honor its commitments or negotiate a fair agreement then going on strike is one option to pressure the employer to do the right thing.
in this case workers were receiving $400 per week in strike benefits and now are receiving unemployment benefits while they are on strike.
These benefits, the support of elected officials, and the ability to have a rally with thousands of suppporters is why nursing home workers should become part of a large union of health care workers like SEIU Healthcare. It has over 1 million members around the country and over 200,000 members in New York alone which is how the workers at this nursing home in the bronx were able to get over 6,000 supporters to a rally.