<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Survey Lessons: CNA&#8217;s On Inspection Team</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nursingassistants.net/2008/05/15/survey-lessons-cnas-on-inspection-team/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nursingassistants.net/2008/05/15/survey-lessons-cnas-on-inspection-team/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:42:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://nursingassistants.net/2008/05/15/survey-lessons-cnas-on-inspection-team/comment-page-1/#comment-39339</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nursingassistants.net/?p=977#comment-39339</guid>
		<description>Lori,
Kim got her information from an article at the New York Times. Did you read it? I think not for there is ample evidence there of faulty survey process and missed problems. Most CNA&#039;s I know can list off many instances of fraud, phoney staffing numbers on normal days and bloated staffing when inspections take place. While nurses may know **exactly** what they are looking for, it&#039;s pretty obvious they don&#039;t KNOW it **ALL** and, only an aide can sniff out the ills of another aide. 

Your comment is reflective of the bigger problem we have: Disrespect for CNA&#039;s and other direct care workers. You should be ashamed of yourself for lowering to such antics. For without CNA&#039;s, nurses could not be what they are. Further, nursing homes in general are good places for cattle-ranch style of care. Nursing homes are not the ideal place for residents though. Impersonal, task driven and regulatory-bloated life is not normal nor good. Nursing homes deserve the reputation they have; and this rep is not the fault of the aides. Many whom chose this work as a career. Your demeaning comments are not welcome here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lori,<br />
Kim got her information from an article at the New York Times. Did you read it? I think not for there is ample evidence there of faulty survey process and missed problems. Most CNA&#8217;s I know can list off many instances of fraud, phoney staffing numbers on normal days and bloated staffing when inspections take place. While nurses may know **exactly** what they are looking for, it&#8217;s pretty obvious they don&#8217;t KNOW it **ALL** and, only an aide can sniff out the ills of another aide. </p>
<p>Your comment is reflective of the bigger problem we have: Disrespect for CNA&#8217;s and other direct care workers. You should be ashamed of yourself for lowering to such antics. For without CNA&#8217;s, nurses could not be what they are. Further, nursing homes in general are good places for cattle-ranch style of care. Nursing homes are not the ideal place for residents though. Impersonal, task driven and regulatory-bloated life is not normal nor good. Nursing homes deserve the reputation they have; and this rep is not the fault of the aides. Many whom chose this work as a career. Your demeaning comments are not welcome here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://nursingassistants.net/2008/05/15/survey-lessons-cnas-on-inspection-team/comment-page-1/#comment-39338</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 22:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nursingassistants.net/?p=977#comment-39338</guid>
		<description>I would like to know where you (Kim) get your information. The DOH only hires experienced nurses for inspections. They know exactly what they are doing and looking for. Don&#039;t let it fool you. If your really that concerned, go back to school for your nursing degree. Seems all you can do is give a bad name for nursing homes and their workers. Shame on You!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know where you (Kim) get your information. The DOH only hires experienced nurses for inspections. They know exactly what they are doing and looking for. Don&#8217;t let it fool you. If your really that concerned, go back to school for your nursing degree. Seems all you can do is give a bad name for nursing homes and their workers. Shame on You!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://nursingassistants.net/2008/05/15/survey-lessons-cnas-on-inspection-team/comment-page-1/#comment-39333</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 07:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nursingassistants.net/?p=977#comment-39333</guid>
		<description>I think it is a great idea as well.

It will never happen. 

But great idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is a great idea as well.</p>
<p>It will never happen. </p>
<p>But great idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patti</title>
		<link>http://nursingassistants.net/2008/05/15/survey-lessons-cnas-on-inspection-team/comment-page-1/#comment-39326</link>
		<dc:creator>Patti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nursingassistants.net/?p=977#comment-39326</guid>
		<description>I second that Kim...what an idea. It&#039;s worthy of mentioning to the good Senators when I contact them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second that Kim&#8230;what an idea. It&#8217;s worthy of mentioning to the good Senators when I contact them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://nursingassistants.net/2008/05/15/survey-lessons-cnas-on-inspection-team/comment-page-1/#comment-39324</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nursingassistants.net/?p=977#comment-39324</guid>
		<description>Now thats an idea I can buy into. Excellent suggestion!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now thats an idea I can buy into. Excellent suggestion!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
